Race Without Color Essay

In this article written by Jared rhombus entitled Race Without Color, he explains about the going away of feed in humanity and how macrocosm should non be classified that port because there are too many variations. Depending on how a individual looks, they would be put into a certain speed categories much(prenominal) as Afri croupe blacks, whites, Mongoloids, aboriginal Australians, and Khoisans. However, this classification of humans only affect how we gaze others it does not involve our senses or who we are as a person. This can be discriminating. Anthropologists believe that humans should not be classified into a particular race. There are other vogues to group humans, such as natural weft, internal preferences, and fingerprints.Diamond goes on to explain how murkiness may come up in classifications. In the human race, mass in contrasting races are visibly different. This also holds true in the animal world. He gives the example of a common bird, the yellow-rumped warbler. The birds throat color in the west is yellow and in the eastern United States is white. They reserve different songs and environmental preferences yet wear the same name. racial classification for these two birds is simple the color of their throat, song, and their environment. However, their differences in these areas lead to different varied offspring. Some traits in animals alternate because of natural selection. Natural selection has to do with the survival in a particular environment. For example the lapin who is white to blend in with snow so that it is invisible to predators.As humans, we bang all over the world in different areas and climates. We apply traits brought out by natural selection to adapt to the area we live in. Our skin color, body type, height, and hair color all play a eccentric in the environment we live in. Thus is why race is not al rooms a good way to describe heathen differences in humans. If we were to classify the human race by this dif ferent criteria, it would father different groupings. Racial classifications are not a good way to describe biological differences in humans. If we were to classify races by body chemistry, it would be different than races defined by the color of our skin. When it comes to skin color, it plays a quality in the climate. People look a certain way in certain parts of the world so that they can survive in that particular environment. For example, someone with very light skin would not do well in an environment with a lot of sun.Other traits have to do with sexual selection are our hair, eye color, and other stunner traits play a role in sexual preference. In the States today, we dont dye or hair or permute our appearance to survive. Its to become more(prenominal) sexually attractive. Science does not play a part in racial classification, but the way our body reacts to someone does.There is another way to classify humans and that is by fingerprint. To do this, everyone with the same pattern would be grouped together. However, fingerprints have nothing to do with survival. Fingerprints also have nothing to do with sexual preferences. There is no real function to a persons fingerprint.There are certain traits in humans that play a function such as the color of our skin for survival. Others have no function such as fingerprints. Particular traits play a role in sexual preference, such as eye color or hair color. Science does not play a role in racial classification, but attraction does. Our body can tell us if we are attracted to someone or not. People now are more varied in appearance. Now, it is unnecessary to rank people with many difference appearances into a racial classification.