Breach Of Confidentiality: The Legal Implications When You Are Seeking :: essays research papers

Breach of Confidentiality The Legal Implications When You Are Seeking Therapy irregular Psychology 204 November 2, 1996Breach of Confidentiality The ratified Implications when You are hearing Therapy I.The need for confidentiality in therapy A. Establish commit B. A patients billof advanceds Thesis The duty to reprimand has created an ethical dilemma forpsychological professionals. II. Therapists face a moral problem B.Requirement by law to breach confidentiality C. Exceptions for breachingconfidentiality D. Prediction of violence E. doctor on client I. The futureoutlook for therapy A. Conflicting views between the legal and psychologicalprofessionsPeople are afraid to admit to themselves and others that they need to service of process toresolve their psychological problems. This is due to the social stigma whichsociety attaches to people, when they seek assistance from a mental healthprofessional. Consequently it is very gruelling for any person to establish atrusting rela tionship with their therapist, because they fear, that thetherapist might reveal their most private information and emotions to others.Health professionals hence created the patients bill of rights to installconfidence between clients and therapists. The patient has a right to everyconsideration of privacy concerning his own medical care program. vitrinediscussion, consultation, examination, and treatment are confidential and shouldbe conducted discreetly. Those not directly snarly in his care must have thepermission of the patient to be present. The patient has the right to expectthat all communications and records pertaining to his care should be treated asconfidential. ( Edge, 63 ) This bill of rights enables clients to disclose allpersonal information without fears. To fully confide in the therapist isessential to the supremacy of the therapy. On the other hand, the therapist islegally obliged to breach this trust when necessary. The duty to blame hascreated an ethical dil emma for psychological professionals. The duty to warn isbased on a court ruling in 1974. Tatiana Tarasoff was killed by Prosenjit Poddar.Prior to the killing Poddar had told his therapist that he would kill Tatianaupon her return from Brazil. The psychologist move to have Poddar attached,but since the psychiatrist overseeing this case failed to take action, Poddarwas never committed nor was Tarasoff warned about Poddars intentions to kill her.This failure resulted in Tatianas death. The Supreme Court thence ruled thatthe psychologist had a duty to warn people which could possibly become harmed (Bourne, 195-196 ). This policy, to warn endangered people, insures thattherapists must breach there confidentiality for specific reasons only. These some exceptions areHarm Principle"When the practitioner can foresee a danger to an individual who