Westminster Model and the Government System in the UK Essay

Westminster Model and the Government System in the UK - canvas ExampleThis development has effectively undermined the notion of a strong nation-state. Another challenge to the Westminster model is the parvenu Public Management standard, and this has wrought basic changes to the relationship between civil servants and Ministers. Perhaps the greatest deflect has been that of the European confederation, which has seriously weakened the notion of Parliamentary Sovereignty (Lapsley, 2008, p. 10). This situation has been worsened by the decadency of responsibilities to elected assemblies in Wales and Northern Ireland, and the Parliament in Scotland. These latter devolutionary changes have posed a serious challenge to the supremacy of the Westminster executive. In addition, these have shown the Westminster model as being inappropriate in a polity that enjoys greater de rallyization (Lapsley, 2008, p. 10). The Westminster model is distinguished by unhindered executive superiority. This makes certain that parliamentary majority enjoys undisputed control over the central institutions of the government. Consequently, authority and political power are central to the state. In this system, governance is restricted to the elite who are seized with the public good. Such governance functions in a self adjusting and balanced constitutional system (Diamond, 2010). The Glorious Revolution of 1688 destroyed an attempt to perpetuate a Catholic Monarchy. This was achieved by William of Orange and his wife Mary II, and it firmly established the supremacy of the Executive. Such federal agency of the Executive has remained the hallmark of the political tradition of the UK. This excellent system is characterized by an unbiased civil attend to and shared ministerial accountability (Diamond, 2010). This perspective regarding the UK government is not unanimous and has been subjected to considerable doubt. It is believed by a significant number of authorities that the longstanding authority of the government has been gradually eroded. In fact, there has been a shift in power, both horizontally and vertically. Thus, the vertical shift has seen the transfer of power to the European Union and international institutions. Furthermore, the horizontal shift has witnessed the transfer of power to civil society and private corporations (Diamond, 2010). There has been an unavoidable establishment of new territorial power centers. These are located outside the UK and have resulted from constitutional improve and decentralization. Due to these momentous developments, it is difficult to view the Westminster model as a true reflection of existential reality. There has been a transformation from the government to governance, and this has drawn in a vast array of networks and individuals (Diamond, 2010). To a major extent, the government of the UK has retained considerable consistency in its structure and function. This has prevailed, despite the advent of collectivism a nd the monumental changes that its society has been subjected to. The government is decisive and accountable, with a scant change in the institutions of Westminster and Whitehall. It has been the established serve for politicians of the various political hues to consider themselves as responsible and influential arbiters of national interest (Diamond, 2010).